For the first eighteen years of my life, I was a independent, fundamental, mission-minded Baptist. I make no apologies for that. I am grateful for such an upbringing because it laid a foundation for a rock solid faith in Jesus Christ. It also prepared me for my ministry and I will be forever grateful to my home church for giving me all of that.
When I was eighteen, God opened the door for me to serve in my first staff position. I was called as a part-time Children’s Director while I was in college at Northern Kentucky University. God would use this position to launch me into Bible College and eventually on a path to becoming pastor. When I joined this new church, it was a part of the Southern Baptist Convention. This was a new experience for me. But one that I haven’t looked back from.
Doctrinally, there is really no difference between independent Baptists and Southern Baptists. The main difference was that where independent Baptists support individual missionairies, the SBC has the strength of the Cooperative Program, which allows small and large churches to “pool their resources” to send out more. This has always impressed me as an effective way of doing minstry. I did note, however, that with all the Boards, Agencies and Institutions of the SBC, it was a little overwhelming at first. I often joked about Nashville being “The Baptist Vatican.” But of course, that wasn’t true. SBC’ers pride themselves on being an autonomous local church and say that all decisons are made there. That used to be the way things went.
I write this essay not to critcize our denomination, or even anyone in particular. Rather, I am writing it to point out my concerns that the autonomy of local churches is no longer respected in the Southern Baptist Convention in some circles. This is a serious issue that needs to be talked about. But Steve, my church hires their own pastor and staff. They set their own budget. What are you talking about? Let’s look at some of the reasons I think we all have to be concerned:
1. Funding for several state Baptist Conventions are now dependent upon institutions/agencies of the SBC and not the messengers themselves. In the past, the Messengers had the final say on budget issues. While they still technically approve a budget, power has been given to mission boards to determine essentially how much funding some of our state Baptist Conventions receive. Not only that, but now it appears that these same agencies are dictating how these funds are to be spent and even what personnel should serve in the State Conventions. If you don’t want to take my word for it, fine–but look and you will see at least one lawsuit that one of our agencies is facing over this very issue. Not very autonomous when we allow an agency of the SBC to essentially hold funds hostage over state Baptist Conventions.
2. Heads of some of our agencies/institutions/boards are being protected from having their salaries listed publically. As a pastor, it would be cool to have my salary package protected from public view. However, the issue is transparency. I want the church’s budget to be accounted for in every single penny, and that includes my salary. Can you imagine how people in your church would react if they were told by the Finance Committee or Deacons that “it is not appropriate for you to know who much our pastor makes?” It would cause a ruckus and people would wonder why they were trying to hide it. Yet, at least 3 of our agencies have refused, on more than occassion, to publicly reveal what the heads of those agencies are making. As Southern Baptists, don’t we deserve to know what money is being spent on salaries versus other expenses? Why would these leaders fight this so much? I’m sure there is nothing improper going on, but why open yourself to that critcism unnecessarily? It makes no sense.
3. The Trustee process does not allow our institutions/agencies/boards to be held accountable. As it stands now, if you go to the SBC Annual Meeting each year, a slate of trustees are appointed to oversee these institutions. The goal is that these trustees are to oversee the work of the instution/agency/board that they serve on. Yet, when there are issues raised with many of these trustees, many have been simply ignored or told there is nothing that can be done. Why not? If leaders are not being held accountable, than shouldn’t the trustees be able to move swiftly to deal with the issue at hand? Many fear that the Trustee system has simply become a “good ole boys network” where those in the circle protect one another. As a pastor, I am accountable to the church. Why are our national leaders not being held accountable for their actions and statements? This is a fair question that deserves to be addressed and not ignored.
4. Some of our institutions/boards/agency heads are promoting ideas that run contrary to Scriptures and long held Southern Baptist beliefs. Let me be clear here. While there is a great deal of discussion regarding issues on immigration, that is not at all what I am concerned about. Those who fall under DACA should have some sort of compassionate way for them to continue to contribute to America while we also work to enhance our border security. The answer deserves a lot of time and thought that clearly is above my pay grade.
A while back, two of our agency heads signed onto a “Friend of the Court” brief that essentially stated that we, as Southern Baptists, support the right of a mosque to be built. While I cherish religious liberty and that religious liberty certainly applies to those who are not Christian (or have no religion at all), we should not be actively working to help promote another religion that runs contrary to God’s Word. These two indivudals later clarified their positions, but the damage was done. As head of SBC agencies, when they sign onto such a court brief, they ARE speaking for Southern Baptists. And they did so without any authority other than their own in doing so.
Perhaps most telling is that some of these agency heads decisions in whom they hire for their staffs. A simple look at Twitter will show some interesting, and at times, questionable viewpoints that these staffers are holding to. And yet, we as Southern Baptists are paying their salaries, giving tacit approval.
All of these issues I believe are fair reasons to be concerned. The denomination has increasingly become more focused on becoming a bloated bureaucracy that tells individuals and SBC churches what they should believe. Just by questioning them, you earn yourself a spot on someone’s blocked Twitter list, or face public ridicule for disagreeing. These are all concerns that show our denomination needs to remember that the agencies/boards/institutions work for US, and not vice versa. If we are to truly reclaim local church autonomy, then we must convince those in leadership in the SBC to realize that our denomination is strongest when we work together and truly cooperate. Not a “top-down” approach.
What do you see that could be causing this? What are your thoughts on this? Please feel free to share with me in the comments below. The best thing all of us can do is to pray about this situation. I believe God can and will help us remember that we do best when we truly support one another and have accountability in place. Once we can reclaim our autonomy, than we will be in a position to continue to make use of the resources God gives us at the local level to make a global impact.